From dd129366575f371bcec51b7303bfb273d6edc8a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?louiz=E2=80=99?= <louiz@louiz.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:41:29 +0100
Subject: Do not require revocation info for a certificate to be valid
If anyone has any reason to believe this is a bad idea, please let me know.
---
louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
(limited to 'louloulibs')
diff --git a/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp b/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp
index 7fc40c2..600405d 100644
--- a/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp
+++ b/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ public:
{
return true;
}
+ bool require_cert_revocation_info() const override
+ {
+ return false;
+ }
# endif
};
--
cgit v1.2.3