Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone has any reason to believe this is a bad idea, please let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ref #3228
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because we “delete all node” and then we use the content of one of these
nodes we got earlier.
|
|
fix #3226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And add tests for all the mode changes
|
|
[skip-ci]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix #2886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is a lot faster, and is more consistent
|
|
|
|
As the doc says, the nick changes must be explicit in an already joined
room, and not when joining a room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After printing the message, it calls “call_soon(run_scenario)”, and
sometimes, if a stanza handler has already been queued, then that handler
will be called BEFORE the “run_scenario” function could be run, and so no
stanza_checker had the possibility to be set.
|
|
an internal static object
See https://github.com/randombit/botan/issues/761
|
|
|